Monday 13 January 2014

Professional Development Activity 1 - SSROC Youth and Children's Collections Group Meeting 19/11/13 - Attend and reflect on a Professional Workshop. Theme 'diversity'.




How was the activity relevant to your professional development?

“Tough times and financial constraints have forced libraries to start behaving more like businesses: analysing costs and looking for alternatives to the traditional models of doing library work” (Ogburn, 1994, p 363), enter outsourcing and consortia models.

Kogarah Library is part of one such consortia; SSROC – Southern Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils. On November 19th I attended a Collections Group meeting to discuss the revisions of the Regional Selection Profile document, specifically profiling cooperative purchasing of Children and Youth Material. This meeting brought together several children’s staff members of the SSROC Consortia and other non-Consortia librarians- some outsource selection of materials and technical services such as cataloguing and ‘shelf-ready-items’, and some who don’t.





Were any gaps in your knowledge revealed?

This was the first of these meetings I have attended. It is also the first role I have had the responsibility for Collection Development in the area of Children’s and Youth materials.  Having responsibility for Collection has been a learning curve on my part and having the chance to discuss issues with other librarians was an excellent opportunity.

Children’s and Youth Librarians had been communicating electronically for several months through Karen, the facilitator of the group. Given that the SSROC comprises of 16 local government areas, reaching agreement on the document with such a range of opinions was challenging. Contributing to the meeting and documents were important to ensure my ideas were presented as well as a chance to network.


What did you learn?
 I felt worried that some participants hadn’t understood that the Selection Guidelines for Children’s material were not the place to add detail and specificity. For example in the priority area section one library had asked to have special issues such as same sex parenting added as a priority for purchase in the picture books category. I said that my understanding was that we were creating a generic profile to serve all of us, and that it was anticipated that each library service would focus on its specific needs that may be important in their community. The local profiles were where we would focus on diversity issues. I suggested that an example of what would be identified in the general profile as priorities would be things like ‘Australian content’.
The facilitator of the meeting agreed that the generic profile (Regional Selection Profile document) should be used in conjunction with individual Library Profiles and Standing Order lists. I think this made the rest of the meeting clearer and we were then more on track for agreeing on the document.

In discussing procurement the main issue Librarians were concerned with was diversity. How would our collections be different and unique from one another’s if we are cooperatively purchasing materials? The answer to this is part of the guiding principles of the profile. “The SSROC Library services purchase works across a broad range of subjects but do not aim to collect comprehensively across all areas, only core and popular material” (SSROC LIBRARY SERVICES REGIONAL SELECTION PROFILE, Revised 2013). The fact that we were all purchasing different amounts from different suppliers and different proportions of our budgets made this apparent through the meeting.


Diversity of collections for young people can be maintained by the fact that not all libraries outsource the same collections, and each library is at liberty to retain a proportion of discretionary spending. This may be determined through a range of measures including customer requests, targeted surveying and focus groups. If suppliers are providing around 70% of the same material- the point of difference becomes crucial to maintaining unique collections, local specificity and collections that celebrate diversity.

I discussed with the group the fact that Kogarah Community has high proportion of people of Chinese, Greek and Arabic ancestry. To cater for such a multicultural and diverse group of children and youth we have children’s collections in those community languages, including bilingual items. All of these items are selected in-house and are not subject to cooperative purchasing.

In my case I said that my discretionary budget is also often used to replace weeded materials, and fill gaps in series (because everything we get through suppliers are new materials only) and also to buy things customers have requested.

“The literature related to diversity in libraries has focused to varying degrees on the four issues of staffing, collections, services and organisational climate” (Winston, 2007, p 66). Diversity celebrates difference in various community groups and encompasses acceptance and respect for individual differences and recognises distinct community profiles of race, ethnicity, gender, socio economic status, religious beliefs or other ideologies. Collection development policies can incorporate awareness of diversity both in the community and between other library services will ensure that all Public Libraries are inclusive and catering to the special needs of all communities.
 Public Libraries as community spaces need to provide safe and positive environments that cater for the range of patrons that frequent libraries. The decisions on what materials to purchase for each Collection need to factor in embracing the rich dimensions of each community. With outsourcing the opportunity to incorporate diversity is not diminished if local profiles and library specificity is effectively presented to suppliers. This means being aware of decisions being made on behalf of your library and being active in the development of policy and documentation. “Librarians must be active participants in the development of outsourcing services or risk consequences of services inadequate for their needs” (Bush, 1994, p 409).


Diversity can also be guaranteed by creating individual and unique standing order lists. Karen asked who had up to date standing order lists and overwhelmingly most libraries attending did not have them. Diversity can also be achieved by using discretionary budgets to purchase specific materials. In my case a higher proportion of tactile books are needed for fortnightly storytimes with intellectually disabled children.

What occurred to me during this meeting was that because Kogarah have been outsourcing, we now view it in a positive light. Most of our teething problems have been solved and we’ve learnt the importance of communicating well with suppliers. We have also changed suppliers several times and eventually found ones that fit us. “A good partnership with a vendor is the key to achieving the benefits of outsourcing” (Bush, 1994, p 398). This has been true for us and it was apparent that other people at the meeting were going through some of that  adjustment  with their suppliers to find the right fit for them.

New partnerships have led to opportunities to have shelf ready materials for the Junior Fiction, Junior Non Fiction and Picture Book Collection which has freed up a lot of time to be able to focus on community connection through children’s events and regular programs.

For many others at the meeting who were not yet outsourcing, they had fears about the process, especially giving up the selection materials themselves.
I mentioned that I felt it was not feasible anymore for me to  go back to older models of purchasing, given the demands of working part time and the popularity of children’s programs as well as the huge cost saving benefits to the library. As my library manager would agree, library networking, outsourcing and consortia is now
“considered fundamental to cost-effective library management” (Machovec, 2013, p 1). The idea behind that is that if we can show that we can cooperate on the level of purchasing we may avoid amalgamation of councils.  As some people at the meeting pointed out, conversely it may just work the other way around and mean that councils are more ready to be amalgamated if we go down the track of cooperation.

 I explained to everyone that I fought to retain 100% of the PRC budget as my own to select across all age groups but have actually found it challenging to find the time to manually select every PRC item this year. But I do think it is important to keep that collection in my hands because of so many old items I need to replace and series to maintain.
I communicated to the group that Standing order lists are working well for Junior Fiction at Kogarah. For Junior Non Fiction we have created a comprehensive description of our needs in a JNF Requirement document. I offered to share these with others if they were  interested.

 Fear of homogenisation of collections was a big panic reaction ten years ago and I think some of the more sceptical people at the meeting realised by the end that there was in fact scope to retain unique and locally specific collections with consideration for diversity in the community, if the Selection Documentation, Local Profiles and individual Standing Order lists are in play.





How might knowledge gaps be filled?

Attending this meeting was a useful professional activity as it was a great opportunity to discuss issues that we all face in our day to day work. It revealed to me what a complex task Collection Management was going to continue to be and that time needs to be set aside each week form my 21 hours to focus on development and check what is coming in from suppliers.
 The most apparent from the meeting was that we had much more than collection issues to discuss  for example whether or not to charge for events, online booking systems, stack items, (to keep or not to keep). The meeting revealed that so much could be gained from staying in touch with each other and sharing ideas. It was a helpful exercise listening to how others approached different aspects of programming. I asked if anyone could share evaluation/feedback forms if they use them. It was reaffirming to listen to so many anecdotal tales of what makes our jobs so very interesting, demanding and rewarding.


Bush, C.C., Sasse, M., & Smith, P. (1994). Toward a New World Order: A Survey
            Of Outsourcing Capabilities of Vendors for Acquisitions, Cataloguing and
            Collection Development Services. Library Acquisitions: Practice &
            Theory. 18(4).

Ogburn, J. (1994). An Introduction to Outsourcing. Library Acquisitions: Practice &
            Theory. 18(4).

Winston, M. (2007). Leadership diversity: A Study of Urban Public Libraries.
            Library Quaterley.

No comments:

Post a Comment